
Facilitating Latina Mother’s Access to a California Community College |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective Access and Retention Measures
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Completion Rates
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Group
|
Fall 2001
|
Spring 2002
|
Fall 2002
|
Spring 2003
|
|
|
||||
| High support (25 participants) |
88%
|
80%
|
76%
|
56%
|
|
Low support (20 participants) |
80%
|
55%
|
35%
|
30%
|
|
Control (9 participants) |
67%
|
56%
|
44%
|
33%
|
| Total Participants: N=54 |
||||
Participating in monthly group meetings with other student mothers proved to be a key support measure for the participants. The group with ‘high support’ had access to a monthly group meeting, which helped establish useful and highly effective peer support. This group also benefited from personalized attention through the monthly individual meeting with the program specialist, who handled both private and group meetings. The rapport the mothers established with the program specialist made them feel as if they had someone to turn to with any questions or concerns about the community college. The program specialist served as a bridge between their familiar world and the new college world. The mothers established ties with other mothers through the meetings that further sustained the bridge linking them to the college world. Both were important and beneficial interventions. Angela, a single 29 year-old mother of one four-year-old daughter, clearly exemplifies how crucial the group meetings were for her. She states the following when asked what has been most influential in continuing her studies,
| I was telling Estella [program specialist] that at first, I wanted to go to the meeting for the book money. [I decided to attend when] I found the flyer at home. I already wanted to go back to school and finding the flyer made me want to go even more. But when I went to the first meeting it was awkward because you don’t know anyone. Then when you [hear them vocalize] all of your fears out loud that made a big difference. And as the weeks and months go by you find a lot of things in common. I really enjoy that. I think that’s another reason why I didn’t want to drop my classes and why I wanted to keep going. I did not want to let the other mothers down and I did not want them to think that I would become a drop out. (Authors have edited direct quotes without losing their original meaning for coherence purposes). |
This statement clearly exemplifies how Angela first began community college because of the outreach efforts; but more importantly how the Madres support group encouraged her to continue her studies. This group not only gave her a feeling of solidarity and belonging but also made her feel invested as part of a group, where she had colleagues to respond to whom she did not want to disappoint. The program specialist, as well as the mothers who attended the monthly meetings, fostered a support network facilitating educational success. This support seemed to outweigh the financial help that Angela initially thought would be of the greatest assistance. When a 22 year-old married mother with four young children was asked who supports her community college studies she replied,
| If I need someone to talk to, like about my children, I bring it to the meetings with Estella. I like [the meetings] because it’s a lot of support. When I had to drop this [one] class because it was too much for me to manage the work and the kids, [the other mothers encouraged me] to take at least one class so I wouldn’t fall behind. They really help when I feel like it’s just so much, so much stress. |
The monthly meetings benefited the mothers by increasing involvement with Latina mother peers at the college and providing a venue for comfortable dialogue about challenges and strategies for succeeding in college. Other scholars also found similar support measures to be high predictors of college success (Nora, 2003; Tinto, 1987). These meetings covered various useful topics such as study skills, time management and domestic violence and many others. In addition, the mothers learned valuable public speaking and leadership skills during these meetings since each mother was asked to facilitate two meetings. The availability of free childcare for all program meetings sustained high rates of attendance throughout.
In addition to facilitating the monthly meetings, the program specialist maintained a supportive relationship with all of the ‘high support’ mothers by having individual monthly meetings to discuss barriers, challenges and emerging needs in a more intimate and private setting. While the program specialist was not a trained academic counselor, her role supplemented services already available at the college. In addition, she served as a role model for students through being a bilingual/bicultural, college educated Latina. She prepared herself for the project work by investigating, previewing and experiencing all aspects of matriculation and co-curricular support at the college. To further maximize the success of program participants, she learned about the internal workings of the college and networked with a cadre of existing college leaders whose programs and services would be available to the Latina mothers. She offered assistance and listened to the mother’s needs and concerns as they navigated the college world. The mothers who received this intervention commented on its usefulness and many of them credit the program specialist as well as the meetings she facilitated for their retention success. Fifty-six percent of those who received these interventions continued with their studies versus 32 percent of students who did not receive these interventions (both the low support and the control group combined, see Table 2). Out of the 56 percent, one student transferred to a University of California campus for the 2003-2004 academic year. Of the 33 percent, one mother from the low support group transferred to a California State University campus for the same year. However, while these are success stories in the conventional definition of the word, other noteworthy successes also transpired. Many mothers became more assertive and empowered by having learned how to survive and thrive in a new setting while managing family relations. Some challenged abusive relationships and others sought out better schools for their children so they to could attend college. These changes in the mothers had a direct effect on their lives regardless of school completion.
The mothers who did not have access to the program specialist cited a lack of support, among other things, as one of the main reasons for leaving the community college. Stanton-Salazar (2001) found that support networks foster academic success. In their analysis, Mexican Americans who had helping networks, whether friends or teachers, succeed at significantly higher rates than those who did not ( Zavella, 1987; Tinto, 1993). Our project confirms previous findings and further underscores the importance of supportive relationships to educational success.
Although the meetings and the relationship with the program specialist proved to be the most powerful effects, the outreach efforts, financial assistance and recognition ceremonies were also valuable assets from the student’ point of view. Leticia, a 32 year-old married mother of two teenage daughters and one grade school boy, stresses the significance of the financial intervention when stating,
| It’s pretty tight right now because of the three kids. The girls are in high school and they ask for clothes and shoes and school supplies; it is tight, very tight. But the money that we receive from Estella and the University of California, Irvine to pay for our books at Santa Ana College, that helps a lot. |
While some of the mothers received more financial assistance than others ($500 versus $300 per year versus nothing), in-depth interviews with the mothers in both groups reveal having some type of assistance, especially for books, helped a great deal. All of the mothers have other financial obligations, making education a difficult task to pursue especially considering the rapidly rising cost of books and materials. The group with the most financial assistance did have the highest retention rate. Yet this finding is inconclusive since they also received the most substantial in-kind support. It may suggest, as other research indicates (Tinto, 1987) that additional resources can substantially improve retention for low-income students, but are not a sufficient condition.
In addition to the financial help, periodic recognition ceremonies validated the mother’s experiences and encouraged them to continue their educational pursuits. The program specialist was in charge of arranging recognition ceremonies at the end of each semester as well as orchestrating a culminating celebration to mark the official end of the funded program. These gatherings publicly recognized the extended family members for their critical role in supporting the Madres and more closely connected extended family members to the community college itself by familiarizing them with college programs, facilities, and personnel. Many researchers maintain that Latinos perceive a high level of family support as important and desire geographic closeness to their families (Keefe and Padilla, 1987; Sabogal, Marin and Otero-Sabogal, 1987). Validating these relationships can greatly affect a mother’s retention and overall prospects of educational advancement.
An advisory committee consisting of academics, higher education administrators, and community representatives guided this project from conceptualization to completion. Once the project became operational, students formally joined the advisory committee on a rotational basis, providing a majority of the Madres in the high support group with the opportunity to inform and guide the evolving project by adding their perspectives to the dialogue at critical implementation intervals. In addition to local representatives from the lead institution (UC Irvine) and the partner community college (Santa Ana), external advisors, scholars and community activists from UC Santa Barbara and Los Angeles added direction, perspective and insight throughout the project’s duration.
Scheduled as all day meetings, the advisory committee met twice a year facilitated by the principal investigator. The semi-structured meetings offered sufficient flexibility to expand on salient issues raised by the members while addressing core matters brought to the forefront by participants, advisors, or program staff. All meetings concluded with reflective writing in which advisors would synthesize their input regarding the status of the project emphasizing emerging successes and potential areas of vulnerability.
The present extreme shortfalls in funding for public higher education in California in general and for student outreach in particular pose a significant threat to the participation and retention of first generation college students. For groups such as Latina mothers who represent an extreme within this under-represented group the risks increase. This project is theoretically important, timely, and has crucial policy implications if institutions want to insure participation and retention of Latina mothers. As last year’s severe budget cuts worsened, tuition rose across the board at the community college, CSU and UC, and a sluggish recovery offers no assurance the worst is behind us, making efforts such as those described herein is particularly important. Santa Ana College President Rita Cepeda reported that Santa Ana College significantly cut class sections and curtailed support services in response to the enormous reduction in available funding. Cepeda believes that "it is safe to say that Latinos will make up a disproportionate number of the students who will be displaced" (The Road Runner Newsletter, 2003). As one of the most vulnerable student groups, history and research underscore the high price that Latinos in general and Latinas in particular are likely to pay as a result of these cutbacks. Support services are crucial to their retention and success as first generation college students who are often left out (Lundquist, 2002). As reduced funding and increased demand and rising fees in the community colleges threaten the participation of students who have no alternative path to higher education, careful attention to the findings of this study is one valuable way colleges can insure they consciously seek opportunities to welcome, support and retain Latinas in higher education.
This study was not designed as a model program for outright replication; but rather, as a pilot project and research endeavor from which principles and practices could emerge for general application at other community colleges. Any community college interested in using the resources it has to support Latinas in general and Latina mothers in particular should consider the following:
Gather together key partners and stakeholders to develop an action plan for advancing a formal or informal initiative on your campus including consideration of the following elements as a point of departure:
We conclude that community colleges can play a significant role in enabling Latina mothers to enter and persist in higher education. The community college structure with its focus on teaching and student success and relative affordability makes it the optimal institution for Latina mothers to begin their programs of study. If supplemental measures such as a cohesive support network, and supplemental financial resources are made available the environment will be even more conducive to Latina mother success.
Current insights gathered from our undertaking offer important information about which academic and co-curricular programs and services most significantly advance the progress of this group. These implications enable community colleges to modify and adapt current structures. Doing so will help to ensure that Latina mothers (and the children and extended family members they influence) will join the higher education community instead of perpetually struggling on the margins of a system not structured to serve students with competing priorities the Madres face daily.
Higher education institutions that adopt a proactive commitment to student diversity understand how their central mission is linked with the future of our changing society. The Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA and numerous other scholars have documented the many ways in which a racially diverse student population enhances white students' educational experiences and contributes to the overall educational environment for all learners. These empirical studies provide further justification for institutional investment in the creation and maintenance of a racially diverse student body (Chang and Astin, 1997). Implementing some of the lessons learned from this initiative will benefit community colleges as a whole, and low-income mothers in particular.
Beyond rhetoric and promises, hope for the future and the crushing reality of diminishing resources in the face of growing demand lies the ultimate questionwhat can and will we do with what we have to create and sustain the best possible institutions? To answer this question we have to look at the fundamental purposes of our institutions, at the communities they serve and reshape a definition of excellence for those constituencies depending primarily, if not exclusively, on us as their path to a better life. We invite you and urge you to consider the talents and needs of this extraordinary constituency as you allocate your precious human and capital resources and create a place for them to participate and belong to your institutions.
If you are interested in learning more about implementing the program in whole or in part on your campus please contact Lilia Tanakeyowma, Director of the Office of School and Community Partnerships at Santa Ana College (tanakeyowma_lilia@sac.edu).
Does Diversity Make a Difference? Three Research Studies on Diversity in College Classrooms. (2000) Washington, DC: American Council on Education and American Association of University Professors.
Chang, Mitchell J and Alexander W. Astin (1997). “Who Benefits from Racial Diversity in Higher Education?" Diversity Digest, 1(2),13,16. http://www.diversityweb.org/Digest/W97/research.html
Fry, Richard (2002) “Latinos in Higher Education: Many Enroll, Too Few Graduate” http://www.pewhispanic.org
Gándara, Patricia (2000) “Latinos in Higher Education: A California Imperative” Chicano/Latino Public Policy Seminar and Legislative Day-Proceedings. Sacramento Convention Center.
Gurin, Patricia, Eric Dey, Sylvia Hurtado and Gerald Hurtado (2002). “Diversity and Higher Education: Theory and Impact on Educational Outcomes”. Harvard Educational Review Volume 72:3, fall 2002.
Keefe, S.E. and Padilla (1987). Chicano Ethnicity. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Keefe, S.E., Padilla, A.M., Carlos, M.L (1978). “The Mexican American extended family as an emotional support system”. In J.M. Casas and S.E. Keefe (Eds.), Family and Mental Health in the Mexican American community. Los Angeles: Spanish Speaking Mental Health Research Center, UCLA, Monograph No.7
The LA TIMES, 2002 by Evan Halper, pg. B6. www.latimes.com
Lundquist, Sara (2002). Achieving Equality and Excellence in 21st Century American Higher Education: The California Master Plan and Beyond.
Nora, Amaury (2003). “Access to Higher Education for Hispanic Students: Real or Illusionary” in the Majority in the Minority: Expanding the Representation of Latino/a Faculty, Administration and Students in Higher Education. Jeanett Castellanos and Lee Jones (Eds.), Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
Ortega, Pablo (2002) “Latinos in Higher Education” www.stanford.edu
Ortiz, F.I. (1995). “Mexican American Women: Schooling, Work and Family” (Eric Digest). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools (Ed 388 490).
Parrillo, Vincent N. (2002). Understanding Race and Ethnic Relations. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
The Road Runner Newsletter, 2003 http://ccentral.sbccd.cc.ca.us/NewsLetter/index.php?NewsID=262.
Romo, Harriett and Falbo, Toni (1996). Latino High School Graduation Defying the Odds. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Sabogal, F. Marin and Otero-Sabolgal. (1987). “Hispanics familism and acculuturation: What changes and what doesn’t?” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 9(4) 397-412.
Stanton-Salazar (2001). “Mexican Americans: A Second Generation at Risk” in Ethnicities: Children of Immigrants in America. Rumbaut and Portes (Eds.) Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Daryl G. Smith, et. al. (1997). “Diversity Works: The Emerging Picture of How Students Benefit” Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U).
Tinto, Vicente (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Consequences of Student Attrition. 2nd Edition, Chicago: The University Press.
Zavella, Patricia (1987). Women’s Work and Chicano Families. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

| The Author | |||||
|
![]() |
||||
|
|
|||||